Background Mobile
Real Estate IconReal Estate · Maintenance

Predictive Building Maintenance Software

Maintenance software that moves buildings from fixing what broke to fixing what is about to — HVAC, lifts and plant monitored, faults caught early, and work orders raised before tenants notice.

Message on WhatsApp
Predictive Maintenance Architecture Ecosystem
Work ordersCondition monitoringFault detection
HVAC and liftsFailure prediction

TRUSTED BY TEAMS

letest.ai
Propmodel
aloomah
yeeld
Nostromarkets
Pharmy
/// INTRODUCTION

Most buildings are maintained in one of two ways: something is fixed after it breaks, usually after a tenant reports it, or it is serviced on a calendar whether it needs it or not.

Predictive maintenance for buildings works from condition instead. Sodio builds building maintenance software for property managers and owners that combines work orders, asset records and planned servicing with continuous monitoring of HVAC, lifts and plant — so faults are caught and repaired before they become breakdowns.

Engineer reviewing building diagnostic systems

/// IS IT WORTH BUILDING YET?

When Predictive Maintenance Pays Off

Prediction needs data and a reason to act on it. For some buildings a good preventive schedule is the better investment.

Commercial buildings with a building management system already recording data
Not yet, whenA single small building with no building systems
Expensive, critical equipment — chillers, boilers, lifts
Not yet, whenEquipment is cheap to replace when it fails
Many buildings, so equipment can be compared across a portfolio
Not yet, whenEquipment is near the end of its life and due for replacement
Breakdowns are visible to tenants and costly to the business
Not yet, whenNo one is available to act on the warnings

/// WHAT IT COVERS

What Building Maintenance Software Covers

Work orders

Work orders

Asset register

Asset register

Preventive schedules

Preventive schedules

Condition monitoring

Condition monitoring

Fault detection and diagnostics

Fault detection and diagnostics

Failure prediction

Failure prediction

Lift monitoring

Lift monitoring

HVAC monitoring

HVAC monitoring

Tenant request triage

Tenant request triage

Maintenance reporting

Maintenance reporting

/// FROM READING TO REPAIR

From the First Warning to a Confirmed Fix

STAGE 1 - MONITOR

Equipment is running normally

Readings collected from the building systems and sensors

STAGE 2 - DETECT

Something starts to drift

A fault pattern or early warning is flagged

STAGE 3 - DIAGNOSE

The cause is narrowed down

The likely fault identified, with the data behind it

STAGE 4 - PLAN

The repair is scheduled

A work order raised and timed to avoid disrupting tenants

STAGE 5 - REPAIR

The contractor attends

Work recorded with photos, parts and time taken

STAGE 6 - VERIFY

The fix is confirmed

Readings checked to confirm the fault has cleared; history updated

/// WHAT WE MONITOR

What We Monitor, and the Early Signs of Trouble

HVAC — chillers, air handlers, heat pumps
Early signs of troubleTemperature drift, short cycling, rising energy for the same output
Data usedBuilding management system points and energy meters
Boilers and hot water
Early signs of troubleFalling efficiency, pressure changes, longer run times
Data usedBuilding management system and meters
Lifts
Early signs of troubleDoor faults, trips, unusual running times and levelling errors
Data usedLift controller logs or independent sensors
Pumps and fans
Early signs of troubleVibration, bearing noise, changes in electrical current
Data usedVibration and current sensors
Roofs and plant rooms
Early signs of troubleMoisture and leaks
Data usedLeak and humidity sensors
Fire and life safety
Early signs of troubleTracked for inspection and compliance, not predicted
Data usedInspection and test records
Gradient

///FAULT DETECTION FIRST

Fault Detection and Diagnostics, Then Prediction

A great deal of value arrives before any machine learning. Fault detection and diagnostics applies known rules to building data and catches common, wasteful faults on the first day. Prediction adds more once enough history has built up.

Known problems caught straight away — heating and cooling fighting each other, dampers stuck open, equipment running through the night for an empty building.

Learn More

Once history builds, models learn how each type of equipment behaves before it fails, and raise a job while there is still time to plan the repair.

Learn More

Tenant requests with photos read and sorted by trade and urgency before anyone opens them, and routed to the right contractor.

Learn More

/// COMPARE

Reactive, Preventive or Predictive Maintenance

When work happens
ReactiveAfter something breaks
PreventiveOn a fixed schedule
PredictiveWhen the data shows it is needed
Tenant impact
ReactiveHighest — they find the fault
PreventiveLower
PredictiveLowest
Wasted servicing
ReactiveNone, but costly failures
PreventiveSome — equipment serviced whether it needs it or not
PredictiveLeast
Data needed
ReactiveNone
PreventiveAn asset register and schedule
PredictiveBuilding data and history
Best for
ReactiveCheap equipment that is easy to replace
PreventiveStatutory inspections and simple assets
PredictiveCritical, expensive equipment

/// COST AND TIMELINE

What Drives the Cost and Timeline

A pilot on one building, using its existing data, typically runs within 30 days, with fault detection working from the start. A production system across the portfolio follows within 90.

30 daysPilot on one building
90 daysProduction system across the portfolio

The cost moves with six things: how many buildings and how much equipment are covered; how the building systems are connected; whether sensors need to be added; access to lift data, which often depends on the lift manufacturer; whether it replaces an existing maintenance system or works alongside one; and how deep the analytics go.

/// FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

It is maintaining building equipment according to its condition rather than a calendar or a breakdown. Instead of servicing a chiller every six months regardless, or waiting for tenants to complain it has stopped, the system watches the data coming from it and raises a job when the readings show it starting to degrade.

Often not, at least to start. Many commercial buildings already have a building management system recording far more than anyone looks at. Older and residential buildings may need sensors added, and it is usually worth doing only on critical, expensive equipment rather than everything.

Usually, through standard building protocols such as BACnet and Modbus or the manufacturer's own interface. We read from the building systems by default. Changing how equipment runs is a separate decision with its own safety checks, and it is never switched on without your engineers agreeing to it.

Lift data is often held by the lift manufacturer under the service contract, so access has to be agreed with them. Where it cannot be, independent sensors can monitor doors, trips and running patterns. Either way, lift problems are among the most visible failures a building has, which makes them a good place to start.

No. It gives your contractor better information — what failed, when, and what the data showed beforehand — and gives you evidence of how well the contract is being delivered. Many owners find it changes the conversation about service levels.

Against how the building runs today. Before anything is built, we agree the baseline — reactive call-outs, downtime, tenant complaints, energy use and repair cost per asset — and the pilot is judged against it.

/// GET STARTED

Start With the Equipment That Fails Most

Tell us which equipment causes the most call-outs and complaints, and whether your buildings have a building management system. We will assess, free, what your existing data can already tell you — and what it would take to act on it.

Contact Us