Background Mobile
Conference Management Icon/// EVENTS · CONFERENCES

Conference & Abstract
Management Software

Calls for papers, abstract submission, peer review, programme building and speaker management for academic, scientific, medical and professional conferences — in one system instead of email and spreadsheets.

WhatsAppMessage on WhatsApp
Conference & Abstract Management Architecture
Call for papersPeer reviewProgramme building
Speaker managementProceedings

TRUSTED BY TEAMS

letest.ai
Propmodel
aloomah
yeeld
Nostromarkets
Pharmy
/// INTRODUCTION

Behind every conference programme are hundreds of submissions, reviewers who must not see their colleagues’ work, decisions to send, sessions to schedule without clashes, and speakers who need chasing for slides.

Sodio builds conference management systems that run all of it: the call for papers, abstract submission and peer review, decisions, programme building, speaker management and proceedings — for academic, scientific, medical and professional conferences.

Conference presentation hall with audience

/// IS CUSTOM RIGHT FOR YOU?

When an Existing Conference Tool Is Enough

Academic conferences often use tools such as EasyChair, professional conferences use abstract management products such as Oxford Abstracts, and tech conferences use speaker tools such as Sessionize. If one fits your process, use it.

An existing tool fits when

  • One conference a year with a standard review process
  • Standard submission forms are enough
  • Data can stay in the tool
  • No accreditation or publishing requirements

Custom conference management fits when

  • Many conferences, journals or meetings sharing reviewers and authors
  • Submission and review rules are specific to your discipline
  • Submissions, speakers and attendees must connect to your membership and registration systems
  • Continuing education credits, disclosures or proceedings are required

/// WHAT IT COVERS

What Conference Management Software Covers

Call for papers

Call for papers

Abstract submission

Abstract submission

Reviewer management

Reviewer management

Peer review

Peer review

Decisions and notifications

Decisions and notifications

Programme building

Programme building

Speaker management

Speaker management

Posters and presentations

Posters and presentations

Proceedings publishing

Proceedings publishing

Accreditation and disclosures

Accreditation and disclosures

/// FROM CALL TO PROGRAMME

From Call for Papers to Published Proceedings

STAGE 1 - CALL

The call for papers opens

Submission site live, with categories, guidelines and deadlines

STAGE 2 - SUBMIT

Authors send their work

Abstracts, files and co-authors collected and checked for completeness

STAGE 3 - REVIEW

Experts assess submissions

Reviewers assigned by expertise, conflicts excluded, scores collected

STAGE 4 - DECIDE

The committee chooses

Decisions recorded and authors notified with feedback

STAGE 5 - BUILD THE PROGRAMME

Accepted work is scheduled

Sessions, rooms and timeslots arranged without clashes

STAGE 6 - PRESENT AND PUBLISH

The conference happens

Speaker materials ready; proceedings and recordings published

/// WHY PEER REVIEW IS HARD

Why Peer Review Is Harder Than It Looks

Conflicts of interest
What it looks likeA reviewer assessing a colleague’s or co-author’s work
How it is handledConflicts detected from institutions and co-authorship and excluded
Keeping review blind
What it looks likeAuthor names left in files or metadata
How it is handledIdentifying details hidden from reviewers where review is blind
Uneven workloads
What it looks likeA few reviewers given most of the submissions
How it is handledAssignments balanced across the reviewer pool
Inconsistent scoring
What it looks likeOne reviewer’s 3 is another’s 5
How it is handledClear scoring forms and scores compared across reviewers
Late reviews
What it looks likeDecisions held up by a handful of reviewers
How it is handledAutomatic reminders and reassignment when deadlines slip
Revisions
What it looks likeAuthors asked to resubmit changed versions
How it is handledVersions tracked and returned to the same reviewers
Gradient

///AI FOR PROGRAMME COMMITTEES

Where AI Helps a Programme Committee

Programme committees spend most of their time on matching and sorting. AI is good at both — and the committee still makes every decision.

Submissions matched to reviewers whose own work is closest to the topic, with conflicts excluded.

Submissions that closely repeat earlier work, or each other, flagged for the committee to judge.

Sessions arranged so related talks do not run at the same time and speakers are never double-booked.

/// COMPARE

Academic Tool, Conference Management Product or Custom System

Examples
Academic conference toolEasyChair
Abstract and speaker productOxford Abstracts, Sessionize
Custom conference management systemBuilt for your conferences
Best for
Academic conference toolAcademic conferences with standard review
Abstract and speaker productProfessional and tech conferences
Custom conference management systemSocieties, publishers and conference series
Review rules
Academic conference toolStandard options
Abstract and speaker productConfigurable
Custom conference management systemBuilt to your discipline
Connections to membership and registration
Academic conference toolNone
Abstract and speaker productSome
Custom conference management systemBuilt for your systems
Accreditation and proceedings
Academic conference toolLimited
Abstract and speaker productVaries
Custom conference management systemBuilt in
Cost model
Academic conference toolFree or low cost
Abstract and speaker productSubscription
Custom conference management systemBuild cost, then you own it

/// COST AND TIMELINE

What Drives the Cost and Timeline

A working call for papers and review system typically arrives within 30 days, with a production platform in 90 — timed to open before your call for papers launches.

30 daysWorking call for papers and review system
90 daysProduction platform

The cost moves with six things: how many conferences and calls it serves; how complex the review rules are; speaker and programme management; proceedings and publishing; accreditation requirements; and connections to your membership, registration and event systems.

/// FAQ

Frequently Asked Questions

Conference management software handles the content side of a conference: the call for papers, abstract submission, peer review, decisions, programme building and speaker management. It sits alongside registration and event platforms, which handle attendees, and is used most by academic, scientific, medical and professional conferences.

Abstract management software runs the process of collecting and selecting conference submissions. Authors submit abstracts through structured forms, reviewers score them, the programme committee makes decisions, and authors are notified — all in one system rather than across email and spreadsheets.

Submissions are assigned to reviewers by topic and expertise, with conflicts of interest excluded automatically — for example, reviewers from the same institution as an author. Review can be single-blind, where reviewers know who the authors are, or double-blind, where neither side does. Scores and comments are collected through consistent forms, and the committee sees them side by side.

Yes. Once a submission is accepted, the author becomes a speaker: the system collects their biography, photo, slides, consent to be recorded, travel details and any agreements, and reminds them before each deadline. Invited speakers who did not submit through the call are managed the same way.

Yes. Accepted papers can be compiled into proceedings in the formats your publisher needs, and registered with persistent identifiers such as DOIs through Crossref, so the work can be found and cited.

It can. Medical and professional conferences that award continuing education credits usually have to collect speakers’ disclosures of financial relationships and track attendance by session. The system collects disclosures with each submission and records attendance, so the information accrediting bodies require is ready.

/// GET STARTED

Start With Your Next Call for Papers

Tell us how many submissions you receive, how review works, and what took longest last time. We will prepare a free solution architecture for a system that runs your programme from call to proceedings — ready before the call opens.

Contact Us